It has been very fascinating to read about how managers and
top executives choose their employees and the styles they utilize to motivate employees
in the workplace. I believe the great
managers understand what makes a team function and are able to utilize this
knowledge to their advantage in order to drive performance and execution. They
constantly have to be investing in the development of their employees to
involve everyone both individually and collectively. When you think about
motivating your employees as a Manager, it all begins during the hiring
process. This is where the good employees are separated from the great. In the
readings from “Good to Great” by Collins I definitely agree with his oppinion
that we must hire great employees because a shared vision can be learned and
most great employees are in it for the long run. Hiring the best employees
possible is definitely the most important concept I would address from a hiring
standpoint. During the hiring process being able to determine which employees
fit best with the company is hard to figure out. The only way I believe this
process can be successful is to focus the interview questions towards figuring
out what motivates the potential employee. In addition it is important that the
candidate is personable, relatable, and confident in themselves. The Executive
Director from Champaign Parks and Recreation that spoke with us last week was
very beneficial in describing the types of qualities he looks for in his
employees. The two most important things he described to be important were a
great personality and someone who takes initiative. He would much rather have
someone that will get out there and try new things on their own rather than
someone that might be conservative and sticks to what’s comfortable to them. As
a young professional that will soon be going through the hiring process and
interviews I really took this into consideration. I think he is spot on when he
talked about giving it your all and showing people how good you are at what you
do. Ultimately it’s important to make the person above you look good by showing
your personality fits in and you are motivated to do your good the best you
possibly can.
This leads me to my next point of how to motivate employees.
There is a lot of controversy out there saying that it is not the job of managers
to motivate their employees and other believe it is the manager’s job to
motivate them. I think it is a mixture of both because internal motivation has
to come from the self which puts the employee in charge of his/her own
motivation. In addition I think the manager must understand what motivates
his/her employees and use it as a tool to create a successful organization. I believe that motivation should not be
treated as a program, but more as a personal approach to deal with employees.
Each person is likely to be motivated differently in a number of ways. Some may
be more intrinsically motivated and some more extrinsically. Based on the two
types I would rather have intrinsically motivated employees, but that likely
hard to find, especially since people change overtime and there is never a
consistency. An important point to understand is that as a manager you have to
know your employees on a personal level with constant communication to figure
out what drives them to be successful. Another way to think of this is to shift
from a “management”
role to more of a “leadership” role. You
manage the projects going on in the business, but you lead the people. This
could start by paying attention to what matters to your employees and focusing
on the WHAT of work and leaving the HOW to the people you hired in these
positions. This builds trust and allows for intrinsic motivation to occur
because they can individually focus on their strengths. Giving employees the
opportunity to do something they will likely be successful with and passionate
about leads to higher intrinsic motivation.
Another concept I believe can help motivate employees extrinsically
is to reinforce. This focuses on the positive and reinforcing what is valued in
the company. For example, when employees are meeting the organizational goals
this behavior should be reinforced or rewarded. Rewarding those who are
accomplishing behaviors that are expected should happen automatically, but
rewarding those who go above and beyond is acceptable in this case. A manager’s
role in motivating employees can be tricky, but I think it’s all about knowing
your employees and keeping a work relationship that allows for constant evaluation
and communication to make sure they will be successful. It is the job of the
manager to set people up for success it’s just a matter of putting forth the
effort to figure out what makes his/her employees tick.
The thoughts in your middle paragraph are really integrative Megan. You have made a clear and convincing connection between motivation and our early semester discussions about leadership/management that I really connect with. I agree that leaders try to understand the intrinsic drives of their individual employees whereas managers excel at creating a structure of motivation (largely extrinsic) that serve all employees - an interesting comparison. I think where this post could have improved was the overall organization. The thoughts were a bit scattered which made the overall argument/aha moment a bit diluted. Also, be sure you proofread your posts!
ReplyDelete